Overview
Is Ethereum consensus based only on ETH posts?
In the inspected Analyst Consensus aggregation, the ETH opinion total counts direct ETH mentions, while the directional percentage also includes BTC sentiment. The count and the percentage therefore use different populations.
Editorial example · not a market forecast
“Does the on-chain evidence support the story?”
A demand argument can lead to Apparent Demand. A profit-taking argument can lead to Adjusted SOPR. Compare the source, asset and time window before joining the two.
Indicator Library →Methodology
How to read it.
Count classified posts with an explicit ETH asset tag for the opinion total.
Add BTC bullish and bearish counts to the ETH directional groups for the percentage calculation.
Read the underlying posts and the BTC comparison before interpreting an ETH-specific narrative.
Interpretation limits
This is a BTC proxy, not a purely ETH-specific sentiment measure. Multi-asset posts and the aggregation window matter; the inspected function does not deduplicate the combined proxy population.
Sources & context
Follow the source.
Prepared for the CQ integration prototype. Source code checked: .
This date records our code review, not a market observation or an analyst publication. These are sample editorial guides derived from the linked sources.
Original services manage sign-in, subscriptions and API access. This preview does not unlock data or change your entitlements.